Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Delay update ... "Extraordinary and excessive" delay - by the litigants ... Contest on costs ... Getting to grips with Qld industrial law takes time ... What is a "worker"? ... What is an "injury"? ... Justice Jenni frigging around ... Slow grind for earnest Circuiteer ... From judges' associate Ginger Snatch ... Read more >>

 

Politics Media Law Society


The End Of The Affair ... Lord Moloch’s bid for more Fox News fans … The Wall Street Journal rallies the MAGA base …Will the old rogue abandon his journalists? … Is “bawdy” the right word here? … The Deep State plumbs the depths … John and Stanley Roth’s generosity to loving causes ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

From the cutting room floor...Handsy Heydon goes to Perth ... Celebrity tour ... Conferenceville ... Dicey's job application speech from 2002 ... Other High Court judges mocked as "vegetables" ... Mason CJ ridiculed ... Speech bowdlerised for public consumption ... Courage of conviction MIA ... From our National Affairs Correspondent ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


 

 

Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Sizzling in the Old Dart ... Story of the complaining law graduate ... Tattle Life brought to book ... Beckham family feud over royal gong ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt's postcard ... Read more >> 

"What you are not being told by the media anywhere is that the death toll likely would not have been as high if it wasn't for DEI."

Charlie Kirk, American conservative and conspiracy theorist on the Texas floods ... The Charlie Kirk Show, July 9, 2025  Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Tootsies with Planet Janet ... Water Softener and the Planet ... Further details of the width and depth of their relationship ... Chief Justice of the ACT grants Justinian's application for access to more documents ... A barrage of text messages and phone calls throughout the Drumgold investigation ... Collated reporting ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Being chased by a dog called Rhetoric ... Justice Virginia Bell on rhetorical devices and barristering ... It seems to be a male thing ... Distractions from the truth ... Tulkinghorn asks, where would the bar be without bad rhetoric? ... September 14, 2012 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« The old silk road | Main | Runaway Greek judge gets 12 years porridge »
Friday
Aug102012

Charting the future 

NSW bar looks for ways to stay bobbing in a turbulent sea ... Economic ideas to the fore in strategy plan ... Relevancy deprivation syndrome could be a factor ... Where are the bar's public voices? 

Barristers without charts

THE NSW bar 'n' grill's strategic plan has received far too little attention, something that should be remedied right away. 

You can read the whole concoction here.  

In theory comments on the plan closed on July 18 and now a process of cogitation is underway. 

The committee devising the strategy comprises Justin Gleeson (chairman), Brian Rayment, Ian Temby, Kate Traill and Mary Walker. 

It is intended that the plan will "chart some of the key objectives of the bar association, and the strategies to achieve them, over the next two to three years". 

See this

Basically, it is a marketing document - a search for ways to pull the bar out of the doldrums - with a few nobs on, such as getting more tails on seats in the inner sanctums of the ABA and the Law Council

There are the necessary motherhood statements about "promoting the public good and collegiality … dealing with the government and the media and promoting fair and honourable practice". 

There are also some good, but not particularly original, ideas: 

  • Development of a national, uniform SCs' appointment system; 
  • Creating a local hub of excellence for settlement of international disputes; 
  • A series of seminars, along the lines of the rhetoric series; 
  • Promoting a non-compulsory scheme of sabbatical leave for members, including a recommendation that each barrister take three months off every seven years; 
  • Schmoozing of solicitors, in-house counsel and government agencies; 
  • More investment in marketing;
  • Smarter, more informative online information about barristers; 
  • Assistance for sole-trading barristers to have the sort of support enjoyed by practitioners in a firm;
  • A more committed contribution to the "public legal domain"; 
  • And, of course, something really must be done about costs.  

All very good, but more is required - a wholesale shift from a closed, reactive bar to an open, engaged one. 

For outsiders dealing with the official organs of the bar, particularly journalists, the process is akin to trying to extract a small, skinless, chicken bone from a very possessive mastiff.  

Questions and requests for information are funnelled upwards to the chief bureaucrat and invariably a negative or, at best, minimalist response is the outcome. 

It's easy to get the impression that engagement is discouraged. 

The bar is worried about being over-shadowed by competing voices. At the moment, it doesn't have a public voice at all. 

Just image a world where barristers participated in public debate and forums on pressing political-legal issues of the day - the future of juries, privatising prisons, litigation costs and delays, workers comp, constitutional reform and so on. 

An online list of experts in important fields, who were available for media comment, on the record, might also be a handy innovation. 

Apart from the obvious show ponies, when did you last see a Sydney barrister on the ABC's QandA or an IQ2 debate, or holding forth at Writers Week? 

If there are any, you can count then on two fingers. 

The outcome, unfortunately, is that the bar as an organisation and an institution drifting towards irrelevancy - which is really weird for people with a lot to say. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.