Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Delay update ... "Extraordinary and excessive" delay - by the litigants ... Contest on costs ... Getting to grips with Qld industrial law takes time ... What is a "worker"? ... What is an "injury"? ... Justice Jenni frigging around ... Slow grind for earnest Circuiteer ... From judges' associate Ginger Snatch ... Read more >>

 

Politics Media Law Society


The End Of The Affair ... Lord Moloch’s bid for more Fox News fans … The Wall Street Journal rallies the MAGA base …Will the old rogue abandon his journalists? … Is “bawdy” the right word here? … The Deep State plumbs the depths … John and Stanley Roth’s generosity to loving causes ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

From the cutting room floor...Handsy Heydon goes to Perth ... Celebrity tour ... Conferenceville ... Dicey's job application speech from 2002 ... Other High Court judges mocked as "vegetables" ... Mason CJ ridiculed ... Speech bowdlerised for public consumption ... Courage of conviction MIA ... From our National Affairs Correspondent ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


 

 

Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Sizzling in the Old Dart ... Story of the complaining law graduate ... Tattle Life brought to book ... Beckham family feud over royal gong ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt's postcard ... Read more >> 

"What you are not being told by the media anywhere is that the death toll likely would not have been as high if it wasn't for DEI."

Charlie Kirk, American conservative and conspiracy theorist on the Texas floods ... The Charlie Kirk Show, July 9, 2025  Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Tootsies with Planet Janet ... Water Softener and the Planet ... Further details of the width and depth of their relationship ... Chief Justice of the ACT grants Justinian's application for access to more documents ... A barrage of text messages and phone calls throughout the Drumgold investigation ... Collated reporting ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Being chased by a dog called Rhetoric ... Justice Virginia Bell on rhetorical devices and barristering ... It seems to be a male thing ... Distractions from the truth ... Tulkinghorn asks, where would the bar be without bad rhetoric? ... September 14, 2012 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Deny, dispute, defend | Main | Supreme Court timebombs »
Saturday
Nov032012

Gummow on circuit

No sooner had he stepped down from the High Court than Bill Gummow is on the lecture circuit ... Artemus Jones was on hand at the Queensland Banco Court to soak-up the vibe ... The end of empire 

W. Gummow: The History ManGRIFFITH Law School sponsored Bill Gummow AC's talk on The Australian Constitution and the End of Empire - A Century of Legal History

The venue was the vast Banco Court in the new complex in downtown Brisbane - the Queen Elizabeth 11 Courts of Law.

This recently opened monument to the law cost $780 million and is an impressive post-modernist pile of exposed concrete and timber. 

Justice Margaret McMurdo opened proceedings by wryly suggesting that Gummow might care to give his next lecture on Roddy Meagher, an unusual suggestion for a female judicial officer, and one that illustrates the difference between the legal cultures of Sydney and Brisbane.

Could you imagine Justice Ruth McColl, for example, making a similar suggestion? 

There was another introduction, this one from Professor William MacNeil, Dean of Griffith Law School - a rather rotund, bearded American who spoke in a language that seemed to be comprised solely of post-structuralist jargon.

He paid tribute to the "original owners" of the site and expressed the view that traditional Aboriginal society possessed a judicial system administered by male and female judicial officers.

Gummov, as Meagher called him, looked a little uneasy at hearing this piece of political correctness. 

The former High Court judge spoke for almost an hour. There were no apparent signs of senility.

His basic contention was that the history of political relations between Australia and England had shaped the Australian legal system, the Australian Constitution, and the High Court's manner of construing the Constitution. 

He contrasted the High Court's method of focussing on historical facts in interpreting the Constitution as opposed to the literalist textual approach favored by most judges of the United States Supreme Court. 

The reason for this, he suggested, was that America had broken with England by means of a revolution, whereas Australia's path to political autonomy involved two centuries of continuing political interaction.

In these circumstances the American Constitution could more easily be interpreted as a bare text. In Australia this was not really possible.

Gummow traced the history of the evolution of Australian legal autonomy from England.

Australia's status as a significant dominion within the British empire is important, and one of the most interesting aspects of his analysis.

Each step towards automy involved political give and take on the part of both countries, often with diametrically opposed interests.

Compromise was the order of the day. It follows that the process can only be understood by means of historical analysis. 

Our lecturer reminded us that the Australian Constitution itself was  Act of the British parliament and that appeals to the Privy Council were not finally abolished until 1986. Of particular interest was the changing conventions regarding the role of the Governor General.

He argued that only an appreciation of historical context can properly explain different interpretations of the Constitution. The text of the Constitution has not changed, but has been interpreted by successive High Courts in a manner that the drafters of the Constitution had not contemplated.

Some provisions have become dead letters, while others (for example, the foreign affairs power) have been given a prominence which would have been unimaginable in 1901. 

Some of Gummow's contentions are contentious.

For example, is it really the case that the High Court has adopted a uniform mode of constitutional interpretation? Surely, some practitioners of the literalist textual approach have sat on the High Court.

And on some issues he could have been more expansive. He did not mention the Anglo-Japanese Treaty of 1896, which provided the real impetus for the Australian colonies to finally form the Commonwealth.

In relation to the White Australia policy, he did not point out that it was Joseph Chamberlain who suggested the inclusion of the infamous dictation test (based on a provision in legislation in Natal) thus effecting a compromise between divergent British and Australian interests.

On the issue of abolition of appeals to the Privy Council, he did not mention the fact that Garfield Barwick and Owen Dixon were strongly in favour of abolition, a matter of some importance in bringing about the end result.

These are minor quibbles.

At a time when history is being abolished and historical consciousness disappearing (the mindless drones, of course, have no need of history, nor do they know any) it is important that jurists of Gummow's stature remind us of its central importance to the law.

The audience seemed genuinely interested in what the former judge had to say - another illustration of the differing legal cultures between Brisbane and Sydney. 

The post-lecture food and refreshments were excellent and there was no admission charge.

Might Gummow take-up Justice McMurdo's suggestion and give us a lecture on the topic of R.P. Meagher?

Artemus Jones reporting 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.