SEARCH
Justinian News

Latest from Brucie ... Bruce Lehrmann v Commonwealth Special Minister of State & Maj Gen Paul Brereton (NACC) ... See SMH >> ... Application for relief under s.39B of the Judiciary Act ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society

Perils of the Defamatorium ... Lovely Linda Reynolds’ “victory” leaves her underwater … Politics, sex, law, and money … Injuries galore … The art of Tottling … Where’s the serious harm? … Trust me … Jurisdictional backwater ... Read more >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Act of gracelessness ... Kathleen Folbigg's miserable ex gratia payout ... Comparable awards in other miscarriage cases ... Weasel words from the NSW Premier ... Need for a proper system of compensation assessment ... Procrustes in a lather ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Six new judges for Div 2 of the FCFC ... More >>

Justinian's Bloggers

Postcard from London ... Summertime - And the living' is easy ... Votes for 16-year olds ... Paralegal's theft by pen ... Spy helping British intelligence from his job at Border Force ... Super-injunction comes out of the shadows ... Feed them strawberries and cream ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"Where are the glossy magazine spreads traversing what Reynolds and Brown went through? Where is the march for justice in support of these two brave women? Where is the apology from Gallagher and Wong? Where is the inquiry into the $2.4m of taxpayer money we now know was paid by the Department of Finance on the basis of false statements?"

Linda Reynolds is the victim here, not Brittany Higgins who was raped on Reynold's ministerial couch ... From Janet Albrechtsen, leader of the Reynolds' cheer squad ... The Australian, August 29, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

News from the Defamatorium ... End of the golden era ... Reputational warriors rack up huge bills ... Unhappy outcomes ... Costs eat the damages ... Al Muderis, Reynolds, Lehrmann ... Statutory tort of privacy to the rescue ... Finding holes in the media exemption dyke ... O.F. Wilde reports ... Read more >> 

Justinian's archive

The Tamil Times ... The corruption wars ... Blitzkrieg from The Australian's legal affairs man ... Campaigns to sink ICAC and 18C ... Battles lost in the trenches ... Where are they now? ... Extravagant fulminations ... From Justinian's Archive, April 8, 2017 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« When you wish upon a Tarr | Main | Barristers required to divulge fees for Hong Kong "sittings" »
Friday
Feb032012

Keddies stuck in the stalls

Judge decides no reasonable person could think he was prejudiced against former Keddies' partners ... Stay also refused ... Contempt hearing against Keddies boys now set for February 16 ... Brigit Morris reporting from the NSW Supremes 

This morning (Feb. 3) Justice Michael Adams dismissed an application that he step aside from hearing contempt proceedings against the Keddies Three on the ground of apprehended bias.

The former Keddies' partners (Russell Keddie, Scott Roulstone and Tony Barakat) are defending a contempt charge for allegedly breaching an injunction forbidding them approaching former clients.

The clients are suing Keddies in the District Court for allegedly mishandling their settlement moneys.

In his swift refusal of the application against him continuing to sit Justice Adams held that no fair-minded, lay observer could reasonably apprehend any prejudice by him towards the defendants. 

The response from Chris Branson QC, for the defendants, was to file an application to stay the contempt proceedings.

Branson relied on last December's High Court decision in Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Nicholls, where the majority held that a failure by a party to proceedings to seek leave against the refusal of an application for bias, would preclude the right of that party to appeal the decision in final judgment.

Robert Stitt QC, for Stephen Firth, the solicitor acting for Keddies' disaffected former clients, pressed the urgency of concluding the contempt hearing.

Stitt said that in light of the defence's use of stalling tactics to delay the contempt proceedings the matter should be resolved quickly.

The application for a stay of proceedings was also refused. Adams' reasons for dismissing the application will be published on Monday (Feb. 6).

The contempt of court hearing has been adjourned until February 16.

Justice Adams' reasons in full 

Brigit Morris reporting

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.