Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Unread emails ... Family law barrister in Adelaide neglects to attend to emails ... Reminders to renew her ticket studiously ignored ... Unravelling chaos ... Trials invalidated ... Liability of Law Society and Conduct Commissioner ... Breach of statutory requirement ... Damages ... From our Team on the Torrens ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


An Australian Abroad ... An essay with pictures … Egypt and the Grand Museum … No end to the antiquities … Down the Nile on a dahabiya … Tombs and temples … Paris and industrial-scale tourism … The Yarts & Kulture ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Annihilation of the now ...Trump's campaign of destruction ... Fake emergencies ... Pointless and farcical executive orders ... Gangsterism ... Looting ... Corruption ... Shakedowns ... White rage ... Christian nationalism ... Roger Fitch unloads ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


2 Wentworth Chambers issues a press release ... More >>

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Weather report ... Starmer sinking ... Farage rising ... Fake law firm ... Fake cases ...  NHS employee cleans up with woke case for hurt feelings ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"Habeas Corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country."

Kristi Noem, Secretary Department of Homeland Security, giving the US Senate her understanding of the meaning of Habeas Corpus ... May 21, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeilgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Spigelman retirement opens wide field of contenders | Main | Brandis blows hard on proceeds of crime »
Friday
Mar182011

LSB recoups payments from defaulting casino solicitor

Vic Supremo orders hapless former solicitor to compensate the Fidelity Fund for payouts to victims ... When will the indignities cease?

The Vic Supreme Court has ordered former solicitor and gambling addict Gabriel Werden to fork-up $637,000 to the Legal Services Board.

This followers Werden's conviction for tickling the trust account that saddled him with a stretch of porridge.

Justice Breach on Tuesday (March 15) found that Werden, who did not contest the findings relating to 11 breaches of trust, was liable to pay the Legal Services Board, which compensated seven victims of the former solly's defalcations between 1998 and 2001.

In October 2006 Werden was sentenced to five years and 10 months imprisonment (with a three years and four months on the bottom) after having pleaded guilty to various counts of theft, obtaining a financial advantage by deception and having a deficiency in his solicitor's trust account.

This included 11 matters of theft in relation to Mary Soul, Michael Di Pietro, Norrene Johnston, Elias Raji, Michael Semaan, Robert Semaan and Morris Koury.

Beach dismissed the first of the Legal Services Board's claims under s.86 of the Sentencing Act, as the application to re-coup the compo was judged not to be as soon as practicably possible after Werden's conviction.

However, in the breach of trust proceeding the board was successful in obtaining orders for the recovery of $637,343.57 that it had paid following claims by victims on the fidelity fund.

Werden said the proceeding was statute barred, he pleaded laches and that his mother had already paid $350,000 to the claimants.

The court observed that he had offered no substantiating evidence whatsoever.

See judgment

Reporter: Alex Angel-Graham

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.