Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Holding onto Hope: Gina Rinehart's Bleak House ... Seeking chunks of the huge iron ore pit, Hope Downs ... Tracing the tangled Wright, Hancock, Rinehart litigation ... Allegations of fraud against the family trust ... Manouvering ... Tax "advice" ... Shifting vesting date ... Money, the root of unhappiness ... Anthony-James Kanaan reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Pastoral care ... Election free content … Cardinal sins … The Pope leaves behind the wreckage of his predatory priests … The law keeps victims in check … Litigation loopholes … Latest cases … Catholic Church’s battle to keep the money ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

"Invasion" of the United States ...Trump deportations ... Detention in gulags ... How much of an enemy does an alien have to be? ... Trump judge turns the tables ... Bush's war on terror shows the way ... Forum shopping for habeas cases ... Roger Fitch files from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Justinian is taking a break during May ... Normal operations will recommence in June ... 

Justinian's Bloggers

Conclave Part 2: Return of the Prodigal ... Vatican fraudster returns ... And departs ... Another struck-off Cardinal re-emerges ... Blowflies in the Conclave ointment ... What can go wrong? ... Silvana Olivetti reports from Rome ... Read more >> 

"We're in unchartered territory here. A Pope hasn't died before during an Australian election campaign."  

Jane Norman, National Affairs Correspondent, ABC News ... April 21, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Letter from London ... Voting at Australia House ... Polling at the Vatican ... Holding down three public service jobs at once ... LibDems want to tone down the noise ... How to foul-up a cover-up ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt on the case in Blighty ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Judgment of the week ... Justice Ian Harrison in the NSW Supremes dismisses apprehended bias application ... Facebook posts by judge's tipstaff ... Claim made by family values applicant that HH's associate supports gay rights ... Battle with a noted sexual equality campaigner ... Purple pride ... Jurisdictional issue ... Finding that cases are decided by judges, not their staff ... From Justinian's Archive, May 10, 2019 ...  Read more >> 


 

 

« Take your hands out of your pockets | Main | What news on the Rialto? »
Sunday
Sep232012

No porridge for spending money illegally

Midway through the High Court's hearing of the Williams' case the government spotted a problem ... Hurried amendments to avoid the possibility of someone going to jail ... Parliament's surrender to the executive ... Rescuing the public service as well as the chaplains ... Polly Peck reports  

Rom Williams: took on the executive's spending power (pic Alan Pryke)

THERE'S an interesting little wrinkle flowing from Williams v The Commonwealth - better known as the case that scuppered the funding arrangements for school chaplains and other god-botherers. 

The case was heard by the court on August 9, 10 and 11, last year and the findings were handed down on June 20, 2012.  

A majority of the court found that successive governments had behaved unconstitutionally in entering into these non-legislative funding agreements. 

During the hearing a few mandarins from the administration turned up in court and paid close attention to what was going on. 

There was a distinct sense the Commonwealth was in difficulty, and that difficulty went beyond the funding of chaplains to the myriad of special interest programs where cash is shovelled out without parliamentary approval. 

So what did the mandarins do? 

They rushed back the Department of Finance and pored over the Financial Management and Accountability Act, with particular attention to s.26: 

"Drawing rights required for payment etc. of public money

An official or minister must not do any of the following except as authorised by a valid drawing right: 

(a) make a payment of public money, etc … 

Penalty: imprisonment for 2 years." 

Yikes! Two years in the clink for spending money unconstitutionally. 

The Commonwealth Solicitor General Stephen Gageler SC, as he then was, had drawn the court's attention to s.26 on day two of the hearing.  

He argued that the Commonwealth had met the necessary conditions for payment of the money, including that sufficient funds were available for the program, the availability of which had been the subject of an appropriation and the existence of a drawing right under s.26(a) of FMAA. 

Yet it was shaky and if the court didn't swallow that proposition then penalties loomed. 

Parliamentary counsel swung into action and as soon as possible after parliament resumed this year the Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Bill (No.1) was introduced on February 16. 

Among other tinkering it repealed the penalty provision of s.26 of the FMAA with the amendment taking effect from April 5. 

In the second reading speech the government said the reason for the repeal was that, "it had never been used for a prosecution". 

The penalty for unconstitutionally entering into spending agreements with the Scripture Union of Queensland, or anyone else on the drip without legislative approval, has now vanished. 

Best to be sure, I suppose - particularly as the later amendments to the FMAA in June this year, to give effect to the High Court's findings, have come in for sniping. 

Prof. Anne Twomey from Sydney Uni cast doubt on whether the Bill effectively addressed the problems identified by the High Court - that there must be a head of legislative power to support spending programs. 

The government and the parliament addressed the problem by dumping into regulations a whole pile of existing and future programs - 427 of them. 

The legislation was passed in just over three hours. 

As Prof. Twomey says

"It it an abject surrender of parliament's powers of financial scrutiny to the executive, and all to save a few chaplains (possibly ineffectively) ... 

The Commonwealth is clearly asking for another clobbering by the court." 

At least now no ministers or public servants are going to wind-up doing porridge. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.