Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Holding onto Hope: Gina Rinehart's Bleak House ... Seeking chunks of the huge iron ore pit, Hope Downs ... Tracing the tangled Wright, Hancock, Rinehart litigation ... Allegations of fraud against the family trust ... Manouvering ... Tax "advice" ... Shifting vesting date ... Money, the root of unhappiness ... Anthony-James Kanaan reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Pastoral care ... Election free content … Cardinal sins … The Pope leaves behind the wreckage of his predatory priests … The law keeps victims in check … Litigation loopholes … Latest cases … Catholic Church’s battle to keep the money ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

"Invasion" of the United States ...Trump deportations ... Detention in gulags ... How much of an enemy does an alien have to be? ... Trump judge turns the tables ... Bush's war on terror shows the way ... Forum shopping for habeas cases ... Roger Fitch files from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Justinian is taking a break during May ... Normal operations will recommence in June ... 

Justinian's Bloggers

Conclave Part 2: Return of the Prodigal ... Vatican fraudster returns ... And departs ... Another struck-off Cardinal re-emerges ... Blowflies in the Conclave ointment ... What can go wrong? ... Silvana Olivetti reports from Rome ... Read more >> 

"We're in unchartered territory here. A Pope hasn't died before during an Australian election campaign."  

Jane Norman, National Affairs Correspondent, ABC News ... April 21, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Letter from London ... Voting at Australia House ... Polling at the Vatican ... Holding down three public service jobs at once ... LibDems want to tone down the noise ... How to foul-up a cover-up ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt on the case in Blighty ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Judgment of the week ... Justice Ian Harrison in the NSW Supremes dismisses apprehended bias application ... Facebook posts by judge's tipstaff ... Claim made by family values applicant that HH's associate supports gay rights ... Battle with a noted sexual equality campaigner ... Purple pride ... Jurisdictional issue ... Finding that cases are decided by judges, not their staff ... From Justinian's Archive, May 10, 2019 ...  Read more >> 


 

 

« Please clean the filters | Main | Rewind »
Friday
Apr302010

Word games

Lawyers can’t write properly … Some can’t talk proper … Now it’s infecting the secretaries … Vicki Mole remembers the Plain English training she got as an articled clerk … It comes in handy
Last year, my secretary was rockin’ the Baltimore street slang, Stringer Bell stylie.

It was all “re-up” on toner cartridges, holler on credit for her “burner”, “hopper” barristers and dodging the “five-oh” on the tram each morning.


Pay that, I too was loving the game, even though others would turn her upside down and look for her subtitles button.

But now she’s taken on a new lexicon and it’s driving me mental. No, she’s not talking like a vampire or a valley girl. Worse.

She’s talking like a lawyer.

It started with an email:

“Hi Vicky!!!

In relation to Friday morning, please note I will be attending the doctor in relation to a health issue in relation to my ankle. Please do not hesitate to advise me if this will be an inconvenience with regards to the X file and I will liaise with Kelli about organising a replacement in relation to Friday morning.

Kind Regards

Kaz☺”

It continues. A Post-it in the fridge:

“With regards to my cheese, please do not hesitate to advise me if you would like some and suitable arrangements can be coordinated in relation to it.”

Vale hands off my cheese.

Alas, it is the older lawyers of the Firm that she chosen to mimic.

We did a lot of useless training as articled clerks – how to use the internet, how to interview clients (as though we’d be let within 50 metres of one in our first five years in the profession), Federal Court advocacy (ibid) ...

But there was one two-hour session that, aside from “I’ll have to get instructions on that”, balancing in heels on the ladders in the Supreme Court library and sub-delegation to seasonal clerks, was perhaps the most useful thing I have learned in my legal career.

It was Plain English™ training: five or so simple rules that could be applied to any piece of writing: short sentences and paragraphs, the active voice, avoiding over-capitalisation and jargon and a list of phrases to avoid and substitute with words the average high-rise pusher would understand.

I appreciate it is currently quite à la mode to complain of such things – if only Don Watson would let it drop and set his beautiful mind back to crafting lyrical morsels for the “working families” brigade – but legalese is ugly, unhelpful and, clearly, infectious.

Sartorially, you either have style or you don’t.

In matters of language, it is so easy to fake-it-till-you-make-it that it is positively inexcusable that grammatical Crocs (seen here) are still mainstream attire in the legal profession.

You don’t need to be a Lord Denning.

Just put the important stuff at the start of the letter, find a subject for each sentence, do a Ctl+H replace for the aforementioned stupid phrases, kill your Shift-happy capitalisation and your words will speak clearer than a visit from Chris and Snoop.

Pay that.

Vicki.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.