Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Unread emails ... Family law barrister in Adelaide neglects to attend to emails ... Reminders to renew her ticket studiously ignored ... Unravelling chaos ... Trials invalidated ... Liability of Law Society and Conduct Commissioner ... Breach of statutory requirement ... Damages ... From our Team on the Torrens ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


An Australian Abroad ... An essay with pictures … Egypt and the Grand Museum … No end to the antiquities … Down the Nile on a dahabiya … Tombs and temples … Paris and industrial-scale tourism … The Yarts & Kulture ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Annihilation of the now ...Trump's campaign of destruction ... Fake emergencies ... Pointless and farcical executive orders ... Gangsterism ... Looting ... Corruption ... Shakedowns ... White rage ... Christian nationalism ... Roger Fitch unloads ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


2 Wentworth Chambers issues a press release ... More >>

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Weather report ... Starmer sinking ... Farage rising ... Fake law firm ... Fake cases ...  NHS employee cleans up with woke case for hurt feelings ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"Habeas Corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country."

Kristi Noem, Secretary Department of Homeland Security, giving the US Senate her understanding of the meaning of Habeas Corpus ... May 21, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeilgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« The joys of the duty barrister | Main | Police have trouble swearing »
Tuesday
Nov222011

Mr Mortified assumes too much

Junior Junior in court to catch Mr Mortified putting his foot in it during sentencing submissions ... Cringe ... When will men learn? ... Nothing should be assumed 

I have made my share of gaffs, legal and otherwise, and I have heard some shockers - but I was in court the other day and witnessed an absolute doozie.

I have to share it with you. 

A notable worthy of the bar, who I will call Mr Mortified, was dealing with a tough sentencing last week. 

The client wasn't a particularly likable fellow (they rarely are) and it was looking like a custodial sentence might top off this case for Mr Mortified and his unsavoury client.

So, like a eulogist at the funeral of an unloved deceased, Mr Mortified was grasping at the straws of his client's respectability in order to convey to the judge the importance that he remain in civilised society.

As he is hitting his peak, referring to his client being a family man and pillar of the community, the crim's wife and three young children straggled into the courtroom and took up some vacant chairs.  

Mortified spied said spouse and noted what a blooming figure of womanhood she was.

Ah ha! She's pregnant, he surmised. He turned to the judge and stated that not only is his client a family man, but he is about to become a bigger family man.

It would be inhumane to remove this caring husband from this lovely family while his wife had another little bun in the oven.

She will need the support of her darling, but misguided, husband during her pregnancy, birth and thereafter, in order to cope with this most beautiful of life's blessings.

As Mortified came to the end of this florid submission, his dutiful solicitor tugged on his robes, pointing to a scribbled note in front of him: 

"She's not pregnant! She's chubby." 

At that point Mr Mortified well and truly lived up to his moniker. He had two options:

  1. With his overriding duty to the court, he must immediately tell the court of his error; or 
  2. Being a kindly man and suspecting the client's wife is already upset (and the client is the sort of fellow who doesn't cope well with people who upset his wife) he would let it go and quietly, after the fact, inform the court and his opponent of this unfortunate misunderstanding. 

Mr Mortified decides on the latter course and promptly sits down.

The judge, in her wisdom, decided to keep the offender on this side of the prison wall. 

Unfortunately, Morty is now in a bigger pickle.

The crown, on hearing that the criminal's wife is not pregnant, is now planning to tender the solicitor's handwritten note on an appeal against the leniency of the sentence.

If Mortified had been a woman, this would never have happened.

No woman would assume another is pregnant, even in the face of breaking waters, unless she was told to her face. 

Men! They just assume ... which to me seems a funny thing for a barrister to do. 

 

Junior Junior

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.