Only One War Left

 

Justinian News

Time's Up for Naughty Nathan ... Recommendation that horrible NSW solicitor be derolled ... Misuse of online funding campaigns ... Spraying ripe and abusive language ... Trolling Robert Beech-Jones ... So unfit and improper as to be beyond reeducation ... Anthony Kanaan reports ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Sex, Bribes, and Club Fed ... Ms Maxwell comes out … Sex offender gets Bryan … The merry-go-round of sleaze … Protection rackets and shake-downs … Flashing orange light for Moloch … Thank God for rigged figures … Morpheus awake ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Act of gracelessness ... Kathleen Folbigg's miserable ex gratia payout ... Comparable awards in other miscarriage cases ... Weasel words from the NSW Premier ... Need for a proper system of compensation assessment ... Procrustes in a lather ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


 

Fifty-six general members of ART rolled over for another three years ... AG's announcement >>

Justinian's Bloggers

Postcard from London ... Summertime - And the living' is easy ... Votes for 16-year olds ... Paralegal's theft by pen ... Spy helping British intelligence from his job at Border Force ... Super-injunction comes out of the shadows ... Feed them strawberries and cream ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

Justice Wigney: So let’s put aside the calling of other further witnesses – how could [Lehrmann] have conducted his case differently?”

Zali Burrows [for Lehrmann]: Let's just say there was a version of what happened that there was loud music playing and screaming or something else happening ... 

Justice Wigney (interrupting): That seems to be entirely hypothetical, because no one was suggesting that version of events, so let's focus on how you say Mr Lehrmann would have conducted his case differently.

Ms Burrows: It’s difficult to know, not being his lawyer at that time.

Justice Wigney: Well, you’re making the submission.

Lehrmann v Network Ten. Full Federal Court appeal ... August 21, 2015  ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Schmoozing and Betrayal ... Judge Water Softener rides into Integrityville mounted high on his horse ... Judicial review of corruption finding ... Unprecedented assistance to morals monitor ... Plenty to think about ... Court reporter Ginger Snatch files ... Read more >> 

 

 

Justinian's archive

The Tamil Times ... The corruption wars ... Blitzkrieg from The Australian's legal affairs man ... Campaigns to sink ICAC and 18C ... Battles lost in the trenches ... Where are they now? ... Extravagant fulminations ... From Justinian's Archive, April 8, 2017 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Launching Eugenia | Main | The war against David Hicks may be over »
Wednesday
Aug152012

Relevance deprivation syndrome and PIMs

Client meetings versus internal law firm meetings ... Partners revolt against middle management ... Dorothy identifies tell tale signs of a pointless meeting ... Core Competency Going Forward ... Watch out for the compulsory dinner 

IN the morning, just after I have prised open my eyes, I reach for my blackberry.

First I look at the emails which have floated in overnight (messages from recruitment consultants and marketing opportunities from the business development team, which never seems to sleep).

And then I look at my calendar.

There are some client meetings. I quite enjoy going to client meetings and consider them to be my core skill and professional obligation.

They also keep the revenue coming in, which I have observed during my long career is quite important to keeping the business afloat.

But, my calendar is also heavily populated with invitations to Pointless Internal Meetings (PIMs). 

There has been a sharp rise in recent weeks of PIMs. 

It is a consequence of the latest management restructure.

Ivan our middle manager loves restructures. Dreaming them up is what he does for a living. 

Except that this time, there is talk that Ivan may have been - just a little bit - marginalised. 

The coterie of partners he manages has been seriously depleted. (Those partners under his wing who don't suffer from Stockholm syndrome have started to revolt and have secured a spot in another manager's stable.)

Ivan is thus suffering from Relevance Deprivation Syndrome. This has caused him to call a lot of PIMs.

I see three-quarters of my day will be devoted solely to an Ivan-convened PIM, with about 20 attendees - all partners.

Assuming it goes for the full five hours assigned to it in the calendar, that is about $90,000 in otherwise chargeable time. 

Here's how you tell if you are being subjected to a PIM: 

• The agenda and meeting topic will be vague. To find out what the meeting is about you must attend and only then you will find the meeting is about one of three things:

  1. Acts of Impossible Genius performed by the convenor to Further the Firm about which there will be a long speech and, very possibly, a power point presentation;
  2. Gotta Do issues, by which I mean things Ivan tells us we have Gotta Do in order to Further the Firm (get better clients, be number one in the energy and resources sector, have a world leading banking practice, that sort of thing); or
  3. Both of the above.

• While it is never absolutely clear what the PIM is about, you do get a general sense that genuflection in the direction of the convenor of the meeting might be a Core Competency Going Forward;

• Even though there is a general sense of pointlessness at the meeting, nobody has the gumption to leave. In fact, attendees will make some half-hearted contributions about things they Intend to Do, Quite Soon, which vaguely approximate the Gotta Do agenda.

• Invitees are told that attendance is compulsory. Ideally the convenor of the PIM will get someone higher up the management chain to telephone the possibly recalcitrant attendees (e.g. me) to exhort them to attend. I was actually told to cancel my client meeting today. I refused.

• The worst examples of the PIM finish with a compulsory dinner at an exorbitantly expensive restaurant with Ivan and other partners.   

With trepidation, I scroll down the calendar to the evening and groan. Oh God. There is indeed a dinner. 

Another evening trying not to get too drunk while valiantly attempting to keep the evening's sense of camaraderie limping along. This in the face of an endless line of boring stories from the socially challenged.

Don't get me wrong. I share a sort of in-the-trenches empathy with my partners, even the most socially challenged of them. However, a key motivator for marrying my spouse and bearing his children was that we enjoy spending our evenings together, even if the evening only involves spag bog and a bottle of red.

Actually, specially if the evening involves spag bog and a bottle of red. 

Hang it.

I'm not going. 

Dorothy

References (3)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Relevance deprivation syndrome and PIMs - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
  • Response
    Relevance deprivation syndrome and PIMs - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
  • Response
    Response: click to read
    Relevance deprivation syndrome and PIMs - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.