SEARCH
Justinian News

Class action against pro-Palestine academics at the University of Sydney ... Toltz v Riemer; Toltz v Keane ... Federal Court file >> 

Politics Media Law Society

My Role in Gough's Downfall ... Reporter-at-Large … Scoops that flushed out the deceit behind the Dismissal … Big anniversary chinwag in Canberra on November 11 … The combined forces of Kerr, Ellicott and cousin Garfield … Constitutional manipulation … Maurice Byers to the rescue ... Read more >> 

This area does not yet contain any content.
Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Knit one, purl one ... Iron Lady of legal rectitude endorses Gageler ... The chief justice wants judges on the straight and narrow ... The cardboard cutout model of legislative supremacy ... The evils of judicial activism ... Procrustes on the dance floor with the Legislative-Judicial Foxtrot ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Justinian is taking a short break ... Normal transmission resumes on Monday, October 6, 2025 ...

Justinian's Bloggers

Berlusconi's dream world ... Revenge politics in Italy ... Independence of prosecutors under attack ... Constitutional assault ... The years of lead ... Investigations reopened into old murders ... High drama at Milan's Leoncavallo ... Rome correspondent Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 

"If we’re only picking people who have got completely lily-white records then we’ll be missing out on a lot of people that can contribute to public life.

NSW Premier Chris Minns, endorsing Mal Lanyon, his pick for Police Commissioner, whose contributions to public life include shouting drunken obscenities at a paramedic who came to his aid, and commandeering a police launch for private entertainment on New Year's eve ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Schmoozing and betrayal ... Judge Water Softener rides into Integrityville mounted high on his horse ... Judicial review of corruption finding ... Intriguing submissions ... Unprecedented assistance to morals monitor ... The scale of the sub-rosa intrigue ... Plenty to think about ... Ginger Snatch reports ... Read more >> 

Justinian's archive

News Desk Special ... Angelic death notices from the bar ... Soapy slips on FOI changes ... Unusual interlocutory costs order for Chris Dale ... Judge ticks off Abbott in letters' page ... Knock About's festive salute to the coppers ... January 19, 2015 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Fresh disruption | Main | Dot and the dinosaurs »
Thursday
May242018

The wide and deep "missing middle"

Funding models and costs for legal services ... A voice from deep within Victoria Legal Aid ... Bare-boned applicants for legal aid ... Federal funding the lowest for 20 years ... Peach Melba on the barricades 

Amid all its fanfare about tax relief, the federal government's budget shows that it is not spending on under-resourced public services. The crisis in funding for the public legal sector is so great that on May 10, the Senate passed a motion calling on the government "to reverse the downward trend in legal aid funding". 

Senator Stirling Griff (Centre Alliance, SA), who moved the motion on National Pro Bono Day, said that the federal government's contribution to legal aid has fallen to its lowest level in 20 years.  

The structure of the community legal system means that when there's a shortfall from the top, the ripple spreads wide. 

State legal aid services provide legal assistance not only through their own lawyers, they also provide short and long-term funding to community legal centres, such as Melbourne's Fitzroy Legal Service. 

Fortunately, in Victoria the state budget has allocated an extra $37.3 million to Victoria Legal Aid over four years. This is to enable VLA to meet the increased need for legal services resulting from the government's injection of $97 million for police prosecutors.

Nonetheless, legal need in Victoria far outstrips the resources of community legal services. The eligibility requirements for a VLA grant of aid are very difficult to meet - based on an income and assets means test. 

An applicant will qualify for a grant if they, and any financially associated person, have a net disposable income of $360, or less, a week. 

Any more than that, and the applicant is required to pay an initial contribution from their income towards their legal costs. 

For the purposes of the assets test, VLA does not count equity of up to $500,000 in a principal home. This means that an individual with property, but low income, may be eligible for funding, while an applicant who does not own a house, but has more cash flow, may not. 

Such strict requirements result in a "missing middle" - individuals who aren't eligible for legal aid funding, but do not have the resources to retain a lawyer for the entirety or a part of their legal matter. 

National Legal Aid, in its submission to the Productivity Commission's Access to Justice paper stated that the difference in the cost of a lawyer at market rate is significantly higher than the legal aid rate, resulting in a "significant justice gap".

When it comes to financial barriers to access to justice, two factors feed in. 

Legal aid is underfunded, which in turn means community legal centres are underfunded. The private legal sector operates on a user pays business model, underscored by a significant tension - firms want their lawyers to notch up as many billable hours as possible, whereas the interest of the client is to pay as little as possible for the legal work.  

Predictably, disagreements between lawyers and clients over costs gives rise to many disputes, at a high enough volume that the Supreme Court of Victoria deals with them at the Costs Court.

The Legal Profession Uniform Law stipulates that "law practices must not charge more than fair and reasonable amounts for legal costs". 

However, fair and reasonable hourly rates for lawyers are determined by the market, which is a creature of convention, supply and demand. 

At this tier of the legal system, clients are viewed as consumers who are charged what they will bear. 

The market reality of the distribution of legal services, and the "missing middle" it creates, is so entrenched in the legal system that the federal funds required to fix it are beyond reasonable expectation. 

Nonetheless, funding cuts directly affect access for those who might otherwise currently qualify for aid. 

From Elif Sekercioglu, who is an intern at Victoria Legal Aid and a volunteer at Fitzroy Legal Service 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.