Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Unread emails ... Family law barrister in Adelaide neglects to attend to emails ... Reminders to renew her ticket studiously ignored ... Unravelling chaos ... Trials invalidated ... Liability of Law Society and Conduct Commissioner ... Breach of statutory requirement ... Damages ... From our Team on the Torrens ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


An Australian Abroad ... An essay with pictures … Egypt and the Grand Museum … No end to the antiquities … Down the Nile on a dahabiya … Tombs and temples … Paris and industrial-scale tourism … The Yarts & Kulture ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Annihilation of the now ...Trump's campaign of destruction ... Fake emergencies ... Pointless and farcical executive orders ... Gangsterism ... Looting ... Corruption ... Shakedowns ... White rage ... Christian nationalism ... Roger Fitch unloads ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


2 Wentworth Chambers issues a press release ... More >>

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Weather report ... Starmer sinking ... Farage rising ... Fake law firm ... Fake cases ...  NHS employee cleans up with woke case for hurt feelings ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"Habeas Corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country."

Kristi Noem, Secretary Department of Homeland Security, giving the US Senate her understanding of the meaning of Habeas Corpus ... May 21, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeilgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« National Treasure | Main | Knees-up at the ALRC »
Wednesday
Jun232021

Tokyo Trial

The post WW11 tribunal that tried the Japanese leadership ... Inventing crimes after the event ... Eleven judges wrestle with the complexities over three years ... Egos muddled with legal principles ... Miss Lumière reviews the Netflix mini-series on Japanese war crimes 

Japanese Premier Hideki Tojo - executed after trial by the IMTFE

War crimes were very much in the cold Sydney air (and in court 18D) when Miss Lumière tuned into watch Tokyo Trial, a richly dramatised account of how a panel of international jurists put alleged Japanese war criminals on trial in the immediate aftermath of World War 11.

Oh what a lovely war it's not. 

Rather, Tokyo Trial succeeds in making riveting drama (and heaps of intellectual hay) from the nearly three years it took for eleven judges comprising the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE) to determine the culpability of the Japanese leadership and their appropriate punishments.

This fascinating, sometimes harrowing four-part series was co- produced by Japan's public broadcaster NHK in collaboration with the Netherlands and Canada.

It is surprisingly good, and not just because it traverses the moral high ground as well as the political low ground.

Tokyo Trial manages to make a whole lot of legal argument interesting because it cleverly focuses on the individual characters of the judges, who hail from wildly varying jurisdictions.

Led by Australian High Court Justice Sir William Webb (a stiffly sour performance by Jonathan Hyde) the IMTFE proves to be the perfect arena for a clash of cultures and egos.

Looming largest in the ego department (aside from Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers US General Douglas MacArthur) is the Scottish judge Lord William Patrick (Paul Freeman), who sees his task as straightforward; simply follow the precedent set by the Nuremburg trials in 1946.

In the other corner is India's Radhabinod Pal (Irrfan Khan) fired with the zeal of his country's imminent independence and keen to test the boundaries of colonialism. 

High Court justice Sir William Webb, from Queensland, President of the Military Tribunal for the Far East

Pal maintained that the "new" Nuremburg war crimes - of aggression, against peace and against humanity - should not be applied retrospectively and that the tribunal was driven by revenge, not justice.

In the centre is the humanist Bert Röling (an empathetic Marcel Hensema) from the Netherlands, who begins by questioning the tribunal's charter, vacillates about applying Nuremburg law and finally ends up supporting the death penalty.

Also in the middle, but clearly aligned with the US representative (Tim Ahern as a very chiselled Major General Myron C. Cramer) and UK are NZ  Supreme Court Justice Sir Erima Northcroft (Julian Wadham sporting a less than convincing accent), Canadian judge Edward McDougall and French colonial jurist Henri Bernard.

China's Mei Ju-ao (David Tse) and The Philippines' Delfin Jaranilla (Bert Matias) come to the table bearing the all too fresh scars of recent Japanese invasion and brutality in their homelands.

Kestutis Jakstas gives an amusing performance as Russia's roughneck Red Army tribunal member, General Zaryanov. 

It's a heady, complex mix of politics and personality, all played out against the utter destruction wreaked upon Japan by the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, surely one the greatest war crimes ever committed.

Tokyo Trial's co-directors, Pieter Verhoeff and Rob W. King make liberal use of archival footage, brilliantly melding scratchy black and white images of the actual trial with film of the actors.

While private doubts and jockeying for influence feature in many of the discussions between the judges, what is at stake is always perfectly clear; nothing less than the future of the "civilised world".

Of course we know what happened in the end: justice was seen to have been done (if one ignores the fact that Emperor Hirohito got way scot-free).

The perpetrators, both military and political, were either executed or imprisoned, the Nuremburg and Tokyo tribunals served as precursors to the International Criminal Court in The Hague, and world peace ensued ... sort of.

Tokyo Trial is streaming now on Netflix.

 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.