Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Around town ... Punctuation advice from Vic's bar ... Feds throw the book at library marriage ... Treacherous shallows in heterosexual discrimination legislation ... Another scalp in compulsory ticketing regime ... Quick Sandy and the unassisted Tamil ... Hands up for silk in Aotearoa ... Theodora's latest rounds ... Read more ...

Politics Media Law Society


Incensed ... Special laws for true believers up in smoke … Extreme unction … Cash splash for prejudice … The two-faced world of Janus Albrechtsen … Stokes, the new Murdoch … Tucker Down Under in relevance rescue mission ... Read on ... 

This area does not yet contain any content.
Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Dark and Stormy times in the US of A ... The MAGA Supreme Court ... Conservative judges flirt with absolute presidential immunity ... A reconfigured Constitution ... Trump's intimidation of witnesses and jurors in NY election fraud case ... Jury deadlocked in Abu Ghraib torture case ... Roger Fitch's Letter from Washington ... Read more ... 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Maintaining legal actions ... Maintenance and champerty ... The Lehrmann mess ... From Geoffrey Gibson, Melbourne barrister (retd.) ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt's letter from Blighty ... Hugh Grant takes the money and leaves the box ... Last minutism ... And suprise round-up for Rwanda-bound refugees ... Read more ... 

"It was a commercial decision ... To suggest anything else would be inaccurate and disingenuous." 

Spokesman for Kerry Stokes explaining the reason for doubling the price of printing the Financial Review on Seven West presses in Perth ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Did Justice Lee get it wrong? ... More on the omnishambles ... Natural and ordinary meaning of the word "rape" ... Disappearance of the ordinary reasonable reader/viewer ... Graham Hryce comments on arguable appeal points ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Leave application rejected | Main | Boxing beats scholarship »
Thursday
Sep262013

Losing touch with ourselves 

Junior Junior goes all political ... Her sought-after insights on the federal election and the bar's tussle over incorporation ... Time for change ... Colleagues agree 

SEPTEMBER has been an enormous month for politics - not only the federal election, but politics at the NSW bar over the incorporation drama. 

Me? I was ambivalent about both. 

Not because I don't care, but only because as far as the choice for running the country was concerned the options were crap. 

As for being an incorporated barrister, I don't fancy it - but I don't have an issue if someone else wants to do it. 

However, I do have an issue with the forest that was felled in the propaganda war from both sides. 

I got to the point where I was throwing out any prepaid envelopes with my name incorrectly spelled. 

To me, the federal election result said that Australians wanted stability - even if that stability comes at a high cost. 

As far as I can see those costs include the environment, women's rights, gay rights, human rights and virtually all other rights that should be self-evident. 

There wasn't much to choose between: a petulant man-child, a bumbling intransigent, a gaggle of yokels, a rich, dinosaur-loving nutter, Hanson, shooters, Christians, and so on. 

It raises the issue of compulsory voting and whether it is doing more harm than good. 

And then there are those preference deals, which allow all sorts of fringe dwellers to end-up with the balance of power. 

Craziness all round, I say. 

In three years time most people would have realised that whoever they voted for in 2013 was a mistake. 

The incorporation debate shows that the bar is working in the opposite direction to the general Australian public.  

While the average Aussie voter is calling for change at any cost, the geriatrics of the bar are demanding no change at any cost.  

I think the bar is doing itself a disservice by attempting to insulate itself from change. It will slowly become extinct if it doesn't get modern. 

Of course, it has a perfect right to stay stuck-in-the-mud if it wants to. 

Lots of younger barristers I've talked to think the bar has lost touch with the outside world in terms of how it is perceived. 

It is no longer regarded as the repository of legal wisdom and an honourable profession untainted by human foibles. 

Some grizzly barristers still see themselves in the same way the clergy used to regard itself - untouchable and immune. 

Perhaps we will have to allow ourself as barristers, in order to survive, to be more of a business and less the pretence of a profession. 

Of course, it would be nice if it was a business that upheld some noble ideals and acted for the poor, etc. 

We can call ourselves a profession all we want, but there isn't a profession that has not been found out for what it is: a bunch of flawed people just trying to do the best for themselves and the customers. 

Anyway, that's what I think. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.