Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Bennett birched by WA Bureau de Spank ... Perth big shot ... Professional misconduct ... Disclosure of privileged information ... Guardianship proceedings ... Breach of orders ... Conscious disregard of the law ... Consideration of recklessness ... Breach of Harman obligation ... Anthony Kanaan reports ... Read more ...

Politics Media Law Society


Back in the ring ... Rape on the minister’s couch … Cover-up … Of course, there was a cover-up … Bettina Arndt and the Institute for the Presumption of Bruce Lehrmann’s Innocence … Linda Reynolds needs sympathy and money … Justice Lee’s loose crumbs ... Read on ... 

This area does not yet contain any content.
Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Other Voices, Other Rooms ... Hack attack on barrister ... Heavy-handed Jewish lobby calling the shots ... No support from chambers ... Eerie silence from professional bodies about Gaza atrocities ... Latest cancellations ... Free speech in a spin ... From our Editorial Board ... Read more ... 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Justice Lee flags referring Network Ten for contempt ... More >> 

Network Ten's affidavit in response ... More >> 

Tasha Smithies affidavit in response ... More >> 

Justin Quill's affidavit ... More >>

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt's letter from Blighty ... Hugh Grant takes the money and leaves the box ... Last minutism ... And suprise round-up for Rwanda-bound refugees ... Read more ... 

"Throughout every step of this process, I have been surrounded by the love of my wonderful family, as well as incredibly supportive friends and colleagues. I can never thank them enough. I also want to say how grateful I am to all the generous members of the public who have approached me almost every single day to express, often through tears, their unwavering support."

Celebrity TV presenter and defamation defendant Lisa Wilkinson outside the court after Justice Lee's verdict in the Lehrmann case ... Aoril 15, 2024 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Algorithmic injustices ... Criminal justice in the data age ... The lurking dangers when algorithms are used to dispense justice ... Predicting the pattern of potential offenders ... Anthony Kanaan interviews Dr Tatiana Dancy, author of Artificial Justice ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Veneto Verona Vino | Main | Cobras in the courtroom »
Friday
Feb162024

Winners and grinners

Smiling policy for lawyers ... Better coordination required ... When smiling runs amok ... Happy lawyers and glum clients ... Delighted clients and anxious lawyers ... Moments of intense seriousness ... Delirious money shots ... From Justinian's Photographic Editor 

In 2019 Matt Collins KC revealed he has an unofficial policy about smiling. He told the Financial Review, over lunch

"My view is the law is a serious business and coming out of court is a serious business. Barristers shouldn't be smiling when they're captured on camera." 

It was a policy he breached in its observance when his client Rebel Wilson cracked a joke which tickled his fancy. 

For some high profile briefs, grinning happily is the preferred mode, even if the client appears distracted or concerned. 

Not everyone is happy

 

Increasingly in high profile trials, we find beaming clients accompanied by anxious-looking lawyers. 

Should clients look happy if their lawyers' don't?

 

Naturally, there is an irrestible temptation for lawyers with celebrated reputations to lighten up and smile whenever a camera hoves into view.  

Moses on the steps of the court

 

Then, of course, there are those memorable money shots of unbridled joy. 

In the bag

 

Ideally, it is safer if client and counsel both maintain permanent grim expressions. 

The Glums

 

The possibilities are various, which suggests that professional organisations need to hammer out a consistent policy about whether it is appropriate to grin enthusiastically outside court. 

To maintain the pretence of success while proceedings are underway, only to go down in a screaming heap, needs to be avoided. 

 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.