Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Around town ... Punctuation advice from Vic's bar ... Feds throw the book at library marriage ... Treacherous shallows in heterosexual discrimination legislation ... Another scalp in compulsory ticketing regime ... Quick Sandy and the unassisted Tamil ... Hands up for silk in Aotearoa ... Theodora's latest rounds ... Read more ...

Politics Media Law Society


Incensed ... Special laws for true believers up in smoke … Extreme unction … Cash splash for prejudice … The two-faced world of Janus Albrechtsen … Stokes, the new Murdoch … Tucker Down Under in relevance rescue mission ... Read on ... 

This area does not yet contain any content.
Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Dark and Stormy times in the US of A ... The MAGA Supreme Court ... Conservative judges flirt with absolute presidential immunity ... A reconfigured Constitution ... Trump's intimidation of witnesses and jurors in NY election fraud case ... Jury deadlocked in Abu Ghraib torture case ... Roger Fitch's Letter from Washington ... Read more ... 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Maintaining legal actions ... Maintenance and champerty ... The Lehrmann mess ... From Geoffrey Gibson, Melbourne barrister (retd.) ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt's letter from Blighty ... Hugh Grant takes the money and leaves the box ... Last minutism ... And suprise round-up for Rwanda-bound refugees ... Read more ... 

"It was a commercial decision ... To suggest anything else would be inaccurate and disingenuous." 

Spokesman for Kerry Stokes explaining the reason for doubling the price of printing the Financial Review on Seven West presses in Perth ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Did Justice Lee get it wrong? ... More on the omnishambles ... Natural and ordinary meaning of the word "rape" ... Disappearance of the ordinary reasonable reader/viewer ... Graham Hryce comments on arguable appeal points ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more ... 


 

 

« I'm a loser | Main | A life of crowded hours »
Sunday
Jun232013

Deferred examination application

Law students and their sense of entitlement ... The daily horror of confronting the demands of undeserving yoof ... Dr Criminale teaches at one of our leading halls of learning and is on the front line of the battle 

Dear student,

Thank you for your email with the attached deferred examination application and supporting documents.

I am sorry to hear that your budgerigar appears to have a head cold, that must be quite distressing. For the bird.

I was not previously aware that vets issued medical certificates. I hope that Pee Pee is now well and truly back in rude health.

How was your second cousin's wedding? I'm sure it must have been a terrific celebration, given that you needed six weeks' absence to attend.

Of course, you kept up with your readings while you were overseas, that was obvious from the quality of your mid-session assignment.

I can do no better than quote a couple of the more memorable passages: "parliament illegalised drink spiking a few years ago" and "penile provisions must be strictly constructed".

While you maintain that the mark I gave your paper was harsh it was, in fact, higher than your mark for last session's effort (which was remarkably similar, despite being on a different topic). Moreover, I ignored your failure to provide any references (which I put down to jet-lag).

Perhaps I should take greater account of your vigorous class participation? This included giggling with your mates at the back of the room and asking pertinent questions such as "is this going to be in the exam?".

You were quite right to defend yourself when I told you that constant texting during lectures was not going to help you pass the subject - you were using your phone to take notes, as I now concede.

By the way, what was that song you had for your ringtone? I'd like to get a copy to dance to.

I'm a bit confused about this bit: "you didnt follow the text book."

Gosh you must have a good memory! I never saw the set text in your possession once. I obviously misjudged your devotion to the subject; clearly, you went home every afternoon to compare what I said with what is in the textbook.

As you say, the textbook is too heavy to carry around, and student health and safety is our highest priority here at the university.

As your lecturer I find myself casting my mind forward a bit and imagining you as a legal practitioner (even if you can get admitted following those theft charges you asked me about).

What would this student be like as a lawyer?

I imagine you fronting up before a judge to explain why that order the court made last month has not been complied with.

"Sorry, your Honour, I have been busy with family business." What a good excuse! After all, judges are family people too. I'm sure you would have no trouble in the profession.

If the judge is really nasty you can always use the reasoning in your email: "I tryed really hard and deserve to get thru."

Consequently, there seems to be no reason for concern; in any event, I am glad to say that your admission to the profession will be someone else's responsibility.

Oops! I forgot to mention at the start - I can't deal with this. Deferred examination applications have to go to the student centre, and thence to the subject co-ordinator, who makes the final decision.

See you next session!

Kindest regards,

Dr Criminale

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.