Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Bennett birched by WA Bureau de Spank ... Perth big shot ... Professional misconduct ... Disclosure of privileged information ... Guardianship proceedings ... Breach of orders ... Conscious disregard of the law ... Consideration of recklessness ... Breach of Harman obligation ... Anthony Kanaan reports ... Read more ...

Politics Media Law Society


Back in the ring ... Rape on the minister’s couch … Cover-up … Of course, there was a cover-up … Bettina Arndt and the Institute for the Presumption of Bruce Lehrmann’s Innocence … Linda Reynolds needs sympathy and money … Justice Lee’s loose crumbs ... Read on ... 

This area does not yet contain any content.
Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Other Voices, Other Rooms ... Hack attack on barrister ... Heavy-handed Jewish lobby calling the shots ... No support from chambers ... Eerie silence from professional bodies about Gaza atrocities ... Latest cancellations ... Free speech in a spin ... From our Editorial Board ... Read more ... 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Omnishambles collectables ... Michael Lee merchandise ... Mugs, wall art, pillows and tapestry ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt's letter from Blighty ... Hugh Grant takes the money and leaves the box ... Last minutism ... And suprise round-up for Rwanda-bound refugees ... Read more ... 

"Throughout every step of this process, I have been surrounded by the love of my wonderful family, as well as incredibly supportive friends and colleagues. I can never thank them enough. I also want to say how grateful I am to all the generous members of the public who have approached me almost every single day to express, often through tears, their unwavering support."

Celebrity TV presenter and defamation defendant Lisa Wilkinson outside the court after Justice Lee's verdict in the Lehrmann case ... Aoril 15, 2024 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Algorithmic injustices ... Criminal justice in the data age ... The lurking dangers when algorithms are used to dispense justice ... Predicting the pattern of potential offenders ... Anthony Kanaan interviews Dr Tatiana Dancy, author of Artificial Justice ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Untrustworthy opponents | Main | Deferred examination application »
Friday
Jun282013

I'm a loser

"Why are you here?" the judge asks ... Lessons from a run of losses ... Junior Junior is advised about the virtue of defeat 

THE first year or two of a junior junior's professional life is usually marked by a series of loser briefs.

Solicitors have no qualms in briefing a baby barrister on a matter that is a dog - the baby barrister is cheap and solicitors are saved from the ignominy of being downed. 

But for a junior junior trying to get their hit rate up, it is demoralising.

Nothing says defeat like a string of losing briefs, some of which involve being bawled out by judges for wasting their time.

This is part of the unending joy of early barristerial life.

So, I was relieved when I had Friday night drinks with my floor leader a few weeks ago to be given some reassuring advice. 

First, losing briefs are the bread and butter of junior practice. Secondly, solicitors don't actually expect you to win them (phew), and most losing briefs are lost regardless of who the barrister is.

This idea that a genius barrister never loses a case (à la Rake) is just that, an idea. There is no reality in it.

The barrister with the fanciest pants will lose a hospital pass just the same as a green reader with their first brief. 

After your eighth straight loss, this is a welcome reality.

On more than one occasion, I have been asked by an incredulous judge, "Why are you even here?" 

There is obviously a fine line between an arguable case and a case that is wasting the court's time. 

During a costs argument, after an unmitigated failure of a case, the judge refused to even consider our carefully explained rejection of a Calderbank offer as, "it should have been obvious to your instructing solicitor from the second he received the instructions in the case, that it was bound to lose".  

While I think this was harsh, it was followed by a good 15 minutes being told that all my arguments were bogus. 

Afterward, my opponent apologised to me - he was mortified at the dressing down I had received.

The good news is, if you manage to win one of these rubbish briefs (such as by default of your opponents, the lack of logic on the part of a famous magistrate or some snappy loophole you manage to run), then your solicitor will love you forever.

There is nothing like receiving an email from a client with an offer to kiss your feet.

But, most of the time you know you are heading into the arena for a bollocking and there is nothing you can do about it, except to practice your poker face and ensure a stiff gin is awaiting you in chambers.

That said, off I go as the next bollocking awaits.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.